Contract Gap Analysis

The risks you don't see are the ones that cost you

BrightDoc surfaces the gaps between what your clients expect and what your contracts actually deliver—before those gaps become disputes, delays, or damages.

Discuss your requirements
Scroll to explore

Manual contract review catches what you look for. It misses what you don't.

01

Hidden exposure

Customer expectations buried in dense documentation go unnoticed until they surface as claims, disputes, or relationship damage.

02

Inconsistent review

Different reviewers catch different things. What one person flags, another overlooks. There's no systematic coverage.

03

Time pressure

Thorough manual review takes weeks. Deals move faster. Corners get cut. Risks slip through.

A systematic approach to contract certainty

BrightDoc reads every line of your client's documentation and compares it—systematically—against your company standards, policies, and commitments. The question it answers: does what you promise actually cover everything your customer expects?

How the analysis works

A multi-stage process that mirrors how experienced professionals review contracts—but faster and more systematically.

01

Document ingestion

Upload client documentation alongside your company standards. The system converts everything to processable text, creating a fingerprint of each document for consistency.

02

Requirement extraction

AI reads through client documents category by category, extracting exact quotes—obligations, specifications, conditions—preserving the precise language used.

03

Finding identification

Extracted requirements are analyzed for distinct obligations. Each finding is severity-rated based on business, legal, and operational impact.

04

Coverage assessment

Every client requirement is checked against your company documents. The system determines: fully covered, partially covered, or absent. When uncertain, it errs toward flagging potential gaps.

05

Prioritized reporting

Gaps are ranked by severity, coverage status, and business impact. You receive a focused report of what matters most—not a thousand findings, but the critical ones.

Built for rigorous analysis

Multiple document types

PDF, DOC, DOCX, TXT. Client contracts, your company policies, technical specifications—all processed and cross-referenced.

Custom categories

Define the specific areas you need analyzed—indemnification, payment terms, liability caps, termination rights. The system adapts to your domain.

Global standards library

Maintain company-wide reference documents that apply across projects. Upload once, use everywhere—ensuring consistent baseline coverage.

Intelligent filtering

Search and filter results by severity, coverage status, or keyword. Focus on what matters for your immediate decision.

Collaborative annotation

Add comments to findings directly in the system. Capture decisions, assign follow-ups, maintain an audit trail of your review process.

Export-ready reports

Generate print-ready reports filtered to exactly what you need. Share findings with stakeholders, attach to deal files, or archive for compliance.

Every finding is traceable to source

Unlike summaries that obscure origins, BrightDoc preserves exact quotes from both client and company documents. Every gap identified can be verified against the original text.

0%

Auditable

Every finding links back to exact document quotes. No black boxes, no unexplainable conclusions.

Conservative

By design

The system flags potential gaps rather than dismissing uncertainties. Better to review a false positive than miss a real risk.

Parallel

Processing

Multiple analysis categories run simultaneously. Comprehensive review without the wait.

Evidence-backed findings, not AI opinions

Each identified gap includes the specific language from client documents that created the requirement, and the corresponding text (or absence) from your company standards.

  • Exact quotes from source documents
  • Section and location references
  • Severity assessment with rationale
  • Coverage status with explanation
  • Confidence indicators
finding: "Limitation of Liability Gap"
severity: High
coverage: Partially Covered
client_evidence:
  source: "Master Services Agreement"
  section: "8.2 Liability and Indemnification"
  quote: "Provider shall be liable for...
company_evidence:
  source: "Standard Terms v3.1"
  quote: "Total liability shall not exceed..."
rationale: "Client expects uncapped liability...

Let's discuss what certainty looks like for you

A brief conversation to understand your document review challenges and explore whether BrightDoc fits your workflow.

Schedule a call with our team